MAN'S WAY vs. GOD'S WAY

Okay, I admit it. The idea that God is this really great ~thinker~ who "snapped his fingers" together (this is metaphorical) and created The Whole Universe, within a couple of days, in what could only be described as "the most benevolent act ever committed by any God" or (God, Lord, God for that matter), is beautiful, but then what happened?

I have given a great, great deal of thought to this matter I am happy to tell you - it is my assertion that people wanted Ipods. Sure, there is "The Garden of Eden", but the evidence for that is circumstantial and God, since then, has committed a number of acts which undoubtedly call into question ~his~ benevolence, i.e. The Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, Etc. In fact, the most benevolent thing which God has done in a long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, time is that ~he~ gave, "his favorites" - THE IPOD, didn't he?

SOME, might say, - Man created the IPOD for himself, which again calls into question the benevolence and supreme power of God Himself. The question then becomes, did God permit man to create Ipods for himself and if God is soooooooo - powerful and kind then why didn't he give just give us the Ipod like he gave us the carrot and the turtle among other things, and even more so, why is it that Americans cannot make anything for themselves, not even an Ipod?

This has certainly become a perplexing dilemma.

Somehow I feel like this has to do with Economics and not GOD, at least not a finger snapping God, so what is GOD? Is God just a myth? Is there something useful within God? Is God within me? Is God entertained by the question of "Who the hell are you?" Unless I get a response I am unwilling to continue, because these questions have all been asked. They are all so boring. There is no end to them and for that reason. Philosophy must prevail!

IN THE BEGINNING...

Yes, another tiresome blog.



Not only just speaking of Internet blogs in general, but specifically of - my own blogs.



All blogs are tiresome.



In the beginning, God created - this is known, but what is considerably unknown is everything else. I, myself - cannot rationally decide that, "God created the whole UNIVERSE in six or seven days." I cannot rationally digest that, "God created the whole UNIVERSE in six or seven thousand years or fifty million years." Whatever difference it makes is astounding. IF, there be no way to rationalize what is actuality, concerning this "element" of belief, then a seemingly endless stream of questions arise, by which and then, the Nature of Philosophy takes its course. For ages, great minds have attempted to come upon some "universal understanding", but to no avail. What does this mean? Has philosophy reached an endpoint? I do not think so. I think that philosophy is in fact powerful but - at this time, there are very, very few - philosophical human beings.



What does this mean? Is there some sort of analogy that could be used to describe this?

"Philosophy is an almost inexplicably complex cross-comparison of rationales."

Pertaining to the above statement:

1. Is this statement true? Yes.


2. Is there scientific proof? No.


3. Is the statement in and of itself - a philosophical rational? Yes.
   

Then, what is Philosophy? Why is philosophy so useless when "put up against" science? Pertaining to Philosophy, it isn't necessarily that, "it is useless", as much as, it is that, "human beings are incapable of using it," as well as, - when human beings are within a philosophical stasis identified as; a wobble, philosophy is subjective.

When does philosophy become objective and what is objectivity? Objectivity compared to subjectivity within a dissertation requires the element known as truth. Objectivity as compared to subjectivity is relationally "butted up - next to truth", whereas subjectivity is discouragingly far from "the" truth, or any truth, meaning, "containing little truth." The question isn't a matter of how close or how far because the terms described herein are physically associated to elements which are only rationales. The assertion that "might is right", which was - made by Plato, gave quite a stir, I am sure, but then he retracted that assertion, some time later. When considering the effects of imperialism upon civilization it is important to assert that Imperialism, does indeed, stand by Plato's assertion, which is that, "MIGHT IS RIGHT".

The assertion that - The United States of America, befell upon - an economic status, within Post-World-War II - economic policy, due primarily, to what is characteristically, an example of, Plato's Assertion, which is, "MIGHT IS RIGHT", is true.

SO, IN THE BEGINNING, GOD created IDEOLOGY, but PHILOSOPHY is more powerful.