The Christian brand of Justice originates from circumstances related to what is divinely evidenced as The Coming of The Son of Man.  Wherein common doctrinal analysis elicits that such circumstances involve a second coming of Christ in the flesh – this however is an errant belief and rather it is that the narrative provided by the gospel transcripts is an indexed source for a game of mechanism design.  Such type of game is atypical to conventional games in that the nature of the game involves information which is not accessible to all players.  Thus, it is necessary to make discovery of such information in order to devise new strategies.  Such type of game involves a player identified as the Principle whom has developed a ruleset rather than inheriting one and mechanism design theory relates that the Principle has an interest in the outcome of the game.  Beyond private information related to the game ruleset – mechanism design theory relates that a player denoted as the agent (or agents) lacks information related to what is referenced as a game initiating event.  It is such case that the narrative associated with the Christian brand of FAITH involves a vague reference which is given in such a way that implies an available prospect (payoff) – however this circumstance involves a great number of interpretations related to precisely what such prospect entails and accordingly all such interpretations cannot be accurate.  Thus, the actual prospect is not in complete agreement with what such doctrinal analyses have varyingly come to associate as the payoff involved with FAITH.

Moreover, what such circumstance involves is mass disillusionment and it is through such process that The Second Coming is fulfilled.  This means that NEW information (discovery) related to circumstances involved with the onset of The Christian Church will culminate into an overall sense of disappointment, particularly for those of FAITH.  The nature of such circumstances as it pertains to the doctrine of FAITH is that which involves a resonation of intellectual substance which contrasts a misassumption that has been (or previously was) widely accepted.  Thus, such involves the evidencing of circumstances which are not as good as previously thought or imagined.  However – such is the case that the same resonation will prepare the way for intellectual disunity among those involved.  Whereas such disunity has been suited as the provocateur of mesmerizing allegiance to some unknown objective and thus the allegiance to an entity behind such objective – it is the evidencing of such circumstances which is the basis of said disillusionment.  This process is outlined within an indexed source which suffices to present itself as a narrative associated with messianic fulfillment.  However, the source itself is commonly and mistakenly interpreted out of form and furthermore ‘context’ and alternatively such ought to carefully be given consideration as something which ‘evidences’ or rather, references – the game ruleset involved with a game of mechanism design.

The divine nature of THE TRUTH and ‘brands’ of Christian FAITH associated with various doctrinal analyses commonly originate from ‘evidence’ of the resurrection and subsequent ascension – however, it is rather the case that such analyses have taken the source information out of form and that instead of beginning where one might think one ought to in an intellectual endeavor to interpret such information appropriately it is rather necessary to begin at the end, in fact the very end and thus such characteristic omits the common necessity of forward progression thereby also inviting an alternative to linearity.  Whereas the narrative which is commonly derived from the source is taken out of form it is rather the case that the appropriate form is characteristically that of a GAME and wherein such circumstances commonly involve a payoff it is the case within this regard that accessing such payoff involves the development of the game outline.  Moreover, developing the game outline is a matter which involves annotation of ‘elements’ referenced within the indexed source – such is a matter of definitiveness and differentiation.

Whereas beginning at the end involves defining such ‘entry’ point it is that such involves an ‘element’ referenced as The Disciple Jesus Loved ­­rather than the primary subject involved with the pseudonarrative evidenced by the source.  Such is the case that references given by the source involving The Disciple Jesus Loved are necessary to the fulfillment of a developed game outline and moreover such references are within themselves a denotation of the key payoff. Accordingly, the substance of such key payoff is that which involves a greater amount of definitiveness than is involved with any other payoff and to such a degree that certainty involved with other payoffs, besides disillusionment (if such are available) is more-so indeterminable.  Such is the case that the key payoff is resolutely associated with a process of disillusionment described herein as a fulfillment of the resurrection.  This is in stark contrast to that which is implied (and commonly derived) in that the resurrection is a matter which involves a reemergence of Christ in spirit and thus not in the flesh and accordingly the ascension references something moreover entirely in contrast to that which is implied as well.  Thus, the reference to the key payoff is subtly given within the conclusion to John wherein it relates information that suggests that The Disciple Jesus Loved will remain until – an event described as “I return”.  Such indicates a direct correlation between the reemergence of Christ in spirit (second coming) and the key payoff which is associated with the process of developing the game outline and subsequent disillusionment – however these circumstances involve a disconcertion wherein the reference given as The Coming of The Son of Man is commonly misappropriated context and thereby such circumstance sets an individual ‘intellectually’ adrift from opportunity related to resolving such disconcertion and moreover such is the reason for intellectual disunity among those involved.

Whereas the correlation (above) marks the set origin of a well-developed game outline – then such is a matter wherein the necessity involves continuing in form to the previous reference involving The Disciple Jesus Loved and so forth.  Accordingly, all such references involving The Disciple Jesus Loved are in John and again – a development of the game outline necessarily must follow such references according to form (in reverse).  Then in an ongoing development of the game outline there is no alternative than to reference a depiction which involves a miraculous catch of fish and in such depiction, information is given concerning such that is symbolic in that the fish represent something other than precisely fish.  Then precisely what this catch of fish symbolizes is divisions among the Christian Church.  Whereas the Christian Church refers to the whole body of those whom are of Christian FAITH such is a matter which involves intellectual disunity among these ranks (divisions). 

Such divisions (previous) are the result of circumstances involved with interpretation of the source – out of form.  Whereas a reference is given that the return of Christ involves circumstances denoted as coming from the clouds – it is the case that such is suggestive of a resolution to uncertainty.  Such resolution is involved with the process of disillusionment and such lacks differentiability from that which is referenced as the return of Christ, which is accordingly – a resurrection in spirit. 

Such depiction (the great catch of fish, above) goes great lengths to ‘evidence’ circumstances related to a key equilibrium strategy involving a disruption of clothing manufacturing enterprise.  Such depiction references St. Peter upon a boat (out in the sea) and curiously without clothes (naked) and thus recognizing his teacher – then dresses and enters the water to meet him.  Such involves a resolution to uncertainty (information) involved with an equilibrium strategy which otherwise is referenced as walking on water and within the case involved with the depiction of The Crucifixion is referenced as casting lots over Jesus’ clothing.  Thus, such depiction taken in appropriate form evidences information which is critical to promoting intellectual unity among those involved – however such is the case that requisites a well-developed game outline and accordingly this is a matter which is beginning to take shape herein.

In an onward progression of a game outline – it is necessary to draw interest upon circumstances involved with what game theory denotes as a game initiating event.  Such is the case that game theory establishes information related to a certain type of game identified as a game of imperfect information and such game form involves information which is private.  This information is related to the history of moves within the game – including that which is identified as the game initiating event.  Accordingly, a key depiction which ‘historically evidences’ proof of the resurrection involves The Disciple Jesus Loved and such ‘element’ is critical to the development and proliferation of the game outline.  Such depiction also evidences a reoccurring form wherein four separate accounts of the related ‘event’ are provided by the source and accordingly such is the case that according to a standard set by other such depictions (wherein four accounts are given by the source) this particular depiction stands out as having the most discontinuity within itself – IF such is taken in appropriate form. 

It however is the case that the onward development of the game outline herein is midway within the evidencing of the payoff structure involved with THE TRUTH (a game of mechanism design) and accordingly such is the case that it is necessary to focus wholly upon such progression.  Accordingly, such then limits itself to information related within John which references The Disciple Jesus Loved and, in such depiction, involved with the resurrection (alternatively, the women at the tomb) it is referenced that Mary Magdalene discovers that the tomb has been opened and she then seeks Jesus’ disciples.  Upon such occasion she locates both Simon Peter and The Disciple Jesus Loved.  Within a ‘race’ to enter the tomb, The Disciple Jesus Loved is the first to arrive however he does not go in and accordingly waits for Simon Peter whom enters first.  Such is of unparalleled weight in accord with the development and proliferation of the game outline – however, such is the case that offset information is given as Peter is the first one to enter the tomb.  It is rather that such circumstances involve the accessing of private information necessary to the development of the game outline and within this regard it is The Disciple Jesus Loved who is involved with such development and conversely in such case the circumstances involved with the proliferation of such (the game outline) then requisitely involve Simon Peter whom accordingly is representative of The Supreme Court.  Thus, the depiction if taken in appropriate form.  Thus, the Disciple Jesus Loved discovers the private information – thus resulting in the development of the game outline and subsequently involves the administration of justice within such circumstances in such a manner which is characteristic of